Leader of the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta, MEND, Henry Okah, has accused the South African government of maltreating him, even as he rejected the dismissal of his appeals by the Constitutional Court of South Africa.
In a statement he issued from Kokstad Prison in Kwa-zulu Natal, South Africa, where he is serving a 24-year prison sentence, Okah said, “I have been assaulted, electrocuted, denied sunlight and possibly poisoned in the last four years. for four years, I have been fed with two slices of bread for breakfast, five slices for launch, and five for dinner.
“Despite being seriously ill, I have been denied access to a doctor and I have been forced to live with a growth in my throat and severe abdominal pains for the last one year but such inhuman treatment will never dampen my spirit.”
The MEND leader said the South African Constitutional Court side-stepped pertinent questions posed to the court by his legal representatives, and vowed to seek redress at the International Criminal Court of Justice at The Hague, Netherlands.
Okah was convicted in 2013 for masterminding a series of attacks including the twin bombings which killed 12 people in Abuja during independence day celebrations in 2010.
The Supreme Court of Appeal had 2014 nullified four out of the 13 convictions and reduced his sentence to 20 years. However, the constitutional court overruled the decision and reinstated the convictions and sentences imposed on him by the high court.
But rejecting the latest judgment, he said: “My lawyers are in complete agreement with my position on the ruling in this matter”, insisting that the finding by the constitutional court that different statutes might be applied to different parties was discriminatory.
Okah continued that the situation in the Niger Delta is a conflict as defined by international human rights law, the internationally accepted body of legislation for adjudicating conflict situations.
“Therefore, prosecuting a party to a conflict in a foreign country under the south African Anti-Terrorism Act, where the same statute is inapplicable to other parties to that same conflict is in my opinion illogical, and in fact, absurd.
“This ruling as handed down by the South African constitutional courts establishes the South African state as the policeman of Africa, an its courts, satellite courts for foreign governments embroiled in civil conflict with their civilian population. This is nothing more than interference in the internal affairs of other nations and in the legitimate resistance of oppressed peoples the world over, which to my mind, is an insult to all the people of Nigeria and the noble fighters of the Niger Delta in particular.”
Okah also said it was wrong for the court to hold that while the Nigerian Government, working in concert with the South Africa to deny him access to his witness while witnesses for the state were transported to South Africa and accommodated at the expense of the Nigerian Government could not have had any effect on the outcome of his trial.
He alleged that he was imprisoned in South Africa at the insistence of the Nigerian Government. He also accused MTN of complicity in his capture and that some personalities in South Africa were rewarded with oil blocks in the Escrovas area and that the oil blocks were being operated by a South African company named SACOIL.
Okah also used the statement to call on all Nigerians to rise up and resist the corrupt leadership in the country.