Transparency International demands outlawing of ‘corruption-prone’ security votes


Transparency International, TI, has stated that Nigeria needs a federal legislation outlawing security votes.

TI Africa programme manager of defence and security unit, Christina Hildrew, made the call on Wednesday in Abuja, at a two-day stakeholders conference.

The conference was organised by Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre, CISLAC, in partnership with TI and support from European Union, EU.

Security votes are funds that are disbursed to cover unforeseen security needs in the country. They are usually at the discretion of public officials, without being subject to independent audit.

In May, TI released a report revealing that $670m is spent annually on security votes in Nigeria.

Hildrew described security votes as “corruption-prone security funding mechanisms”.

She called for measures to put in place for effective oversight structures, to monitor confidential security spending, including procurements.

“Security votes are opaque corruption-prone security funding mechanisms widely used across Nigeria’s three tiers of government.

“Investigation shows that estimates of 670 million dollars annually, transacted mostly in cash, were security vote spending and it is not subjected to legislative oversight or independent audit because of its substantively secretive nature.

“Yet this veil of secrecy protects the many officials who misspent security votes, and they channel them into political activities or embezzle them outright.

“There is a wide issue in the defence sector which is defence `exceptionalism’, that is, the public allows defence sector to be unaccountable for what they spend because of national security issues.

“However, the defence sector should not be unaccountable to the citizens it is meant to protect,” she said.

Hildrew, therefore, called for additional legislative oversight of the defence sector, adding that “we think it is important that parliamentary audit committees and civil societies have a say on how security spending is decided.”

Leave a Reply